 | | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) This is the status quo now for many months. What action has been taken to solve that problem? To me it seems only to be a little adjustment to some lines of code (but maybe I am wrong). So my question would be: where is the bottleneck that (...) (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) Well... imho this should not be an issue at all - if the parts tracker was updated! Philo (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) These truncated filenames never went past the LSC, and as such should probably be held. I personally feel that they are inappropriate, but whether or not I think they are appropriate, I believe that it's the LSC's job to determine that. (...) (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
Hi Steve, (...) One reason: the Parts Tracker still doesn't like >8 names :( Philo (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) I ditto Phillippe's primary suggestion: use multiple files. It's good for multiple reasons. However, the current standards allow at least 25 characters in the filename, so is there a reason to worry about a 9 character primitive name? Steve (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) I would suggest avoiding the problem completely by using a 2-4edge + 3-16edge... In other instances the name was shortened: 3-16cone19 --> 3-16co19 11-48ring19 --> 11-48r19 Philo (17 years ago, 25-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | 11-16 primitives?
|
|
What would be the suggested name for an 11-16 primitive for a cylinder or edge line since 11-16 contains 5 letters and tacking on edge or cyli at the end would give a 9 letter name? (17 years ago, 22-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Technic part file title issues and suggestions
|
|
It's this time of year again where I've got a bunch of part naming issues: - There are two official and a set of unofficial Technic Excavator Bucket parts. The problem just is that the buckets' don't only work as excavator buckets; front loaders, (...) (17 years ago, 17-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 64179.dat
|
|
(...) Ah!!! interesting ;o) (...) It looks good (but I don't have the part - yet...) Philo (17 years ago, 11-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 64179.dat
|
|
Yes, I did state at (URL) that I couldn't model this piece due to my lack of it - but the Front Loader appeared convienently (sp?) in the store and I had all the cash for it, so... now I have modelled the 'O-beam' as well. Enough story-telling: I (...) (17 years ago, 9-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
