To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / *6806 (-10)
  Re: naming for some half-primitives
 
(...) I see. I shall use those, then. (18 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
 
  Re: naming for some half-primitives
 
(...) Please just use the next available axlehoXX and npegholX numbers; axleho10.dat (thats one-zero not ell-zero), npeghol8.dat and npeghol9.dat. I want to sort out a better naming convention for these, but I don't want to hold up creativity. Chris (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
 
  naming for some half-primitives
 
I've got a little little problem with primitives. I'm working on the 61808.dat file (I guess I'll do it with 61811.dat parallel...), and to ease it up and to save disk space the file will be in four quarters. So, to have such things, you inevitably (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
 
  Re: Fixing the liftarms
 
(...) We are aware of this and do have a plan to rectify it. Steve and I went through this a while ago, with a view to distinguishing between beams and lift-arms and consistently naming the beams. I recall our thinking was that "liftarm" would (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Fixing the liftarms
 
(...) Excellent Willy. That's awesome. I still hate the names but at least they're consistent. Tim (18 years ago, 21-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Fixing the liftarms
 
(...) When I standardized the headers of the certified parts at the PT back in August 2008 I tried to rename them as following: "1 x 1" are called Beams example: (URL) X 0.5" are called liftarm example: (URL) aware that only certified parts apply to (...) (18 years ago, 20-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Fixing the liftarms
 
Hi all (and especially Chris Dee), I find the inconsistency in the naming of liftarms in LDraw to be quite frustrating and was wondering whether or not it would be worth setting a standard name class and sticking to it. Here's a sample list: Technic (...) (18 years ago, 20-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
 
(...) Thanks. 30172.dat and 47847.dat will be posted soon, 30135 a bit later. Philo (18 years ago, 8-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
 
(...) Philo, I added the submission dates to the chart. Pick it from the list. w. (18 years ago, 8-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
 
Hi Willy, (...) What about the mention "0 !HISTORY 2007-08-25 {The LEGO Universe Team} Original part shape" for these new parts? Should we change the date? Philo (18 years ago, 6-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR