Subject:
|
Re: Fixing the liftarms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:38:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12130 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Timothy Gould wrote:
> > Hi all (and especially Chris Dee),
> >
> > I find the inconsistency in the naming of liftarms in LDraw to be quite
> > frustrating and was wondering whether or not it would be worth setting a
> > standard name class and sticking to it.
> >
> > Here's a sample list:
> >
> > Technic beam 11
> > Technic beam 4x0.5
> > Technic liftarm 1x2 (even though it's also half thick)
> > Technic liftarm 1x3 straight
> >
> > I'd be quite happy to go through the list and rename them to a standard format
> > if I knew that it would be useful. I'd prefer to have a good format first
> > though.
>
> When I standardized the headers of the certified parts at the PT back in August
> 2008 I tried to rename them as following:
>
> "1 x 1" are called Beams
> example: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/32278.dat
>
> "1 X 0.5" are called liftarm
> example: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/32017.dat
>
> Be aware that only certified parts apply to this scheme.
>
> My 0.2 euro, w.
Excellent Willy. That's awesome.
I still hate the names but at least they're consistent.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Fixing the liftarms
|
| (...) When I standardized the headers of the certified parts at the PT back in August 2008 I tried to rename them as following: "1 x 1" are called Beams example: (URL) X 0.5" are called liftarm example: (URL) aware that only certified parts apply to (...) (15 years ago, 20-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
