 | | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
|
(...) I'm not *against* such a change, but I'm not a big supporter of it. Maybe if we could revive the old primitives committee (you all know who you are), or if there was another admin for the PT who could oversee this project, that would be a good (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: ring 3 to 5
|
|
(...) I wasn't thinking of either, really. I was wondering if maybe the part should be modeled without any primitives at all. I suppose the practical result of that would be primitive-inlining. (...) In the case of the lower arm (forearm), I don't (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Type 5 lines at the edge of primitives
|
|
(...) Wow! This is so cool! These cooperating type 5 control points give us both first order continuity between the cylinder and the tangent plane, AND 2nd order continuity between adjacent cylinder parts. All with just a few small changes to a (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: SW Storm trooper and R2_D2 [DAT]
|
|
(...) I got this from the UCS Xwing posted a while back. It's primitive but it's a start 0 FILE astromec.dat 0 Pitiful attempt at R2-D2 0 Name: astromec.dat 0 Author: Dirtman 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 1 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: high-res sphere primitive with type 5 lines [DAT]
|
|
Well, based on comments in some other threads, I came to the conclusion that the type 5 lines I had around the edge of my original primitive where wrong. I have now updated them accordingly. This version is the same as the last other than that. The (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
