 | | Re: Updated part: Tile 2x2 with Explorien Pattern [DAT]
|
|
(...) I agree with Steve. This Exploriens tile is better than the first one. But vectorized (coordinate-based) patterns display better than rasterized (pixel-based) ones. That is why I still have not completed my road sign "highway marker" pattern. (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated part: Tile 2x2 with Explorien Pattern
|
|
(...) In general, it's OK for me. I never mind someone coming up with better versions of files I did. And this file looks better than the original! But (also in general), BMP2DAT is not the way to go with patterns. DAT just doesn't handle raster (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 30086 (and 30087) 'Rubber' Dinghy [DAT]
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Jonathan asked about this file, so here it is. This is in MPD format, some programs will require you to split it to separate DAT files before using it. Note: this file actually models two separate parts. 30086 is the bottom of the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated part: Tile 2x2 with Explorien Pattern
|
|
Hello Scott, OK.. i do the following steps: 1) First I scan the part at a high resolution and load it into Corel Photopaint. 2) I crop it so the relations of width and height are right. 3) I count the colors of the lego part and let Photopaint (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated part: Tile 2x2 with Explorien Pattern
|
|
Not a bad job Cartsen. What resolution did you scan at? And what settings did you use in BMP-2-Dat32? I tried to do that big round plate form Nawhonics' pod and the file was sooooo huge. It was funny how long it took to calculate too. Hehe, but, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
