 | | Re: alternate for Naboo Starfighter
|
|
(...) 3942.dat cone or the 30151.dat dome piece. Is this a case (...) I will check it out! (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: repost of 7140 X-Wing fighter
|
|
Calvin, Very nice job on this. All the steps match the official instructions, and sub-steps are subfiled nicely. I have a couple of suggestions for improving your file to perfection: 1. Center the "movable" subfiles on the axis of rotation. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: E-6 Recon Droid
|
|
(...) It's all mine, I dreamt it up while playing an old video game (Iron Helix)on my computer. I started building and the pieces sort of fell together. (I love it when that happens :-) (...) I thought about adding a manipulator arm, but thought it (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: E-6 Recon Droid
|
|
(...) Wow! What a cool little model! If you put some sort of blaster cannons on the front of the 2x1 plates with jet engines you could convert it into a pretty mean little battle droid. (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: E-6 Recon Droid
|
|
(...) That's cute! Did you make it up yourself, or is it from something? Jeff - "Onion ring to rule them all..." (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: alternate for Naboo Starfighter
|
|
D Garcia <swlego@aol.com> wrote in message news:FF55pv.5MF@lugnet.com... (...) I have 3939.dat as a windscreen. I'm assuming this should be either the 3942.dat cone or the 30151.dat dome piece. Is this a case of missed number change? You or me? (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | E-6 Recon Droid [DAT]
|
|
Another little guy I was able to dream up last night. LMKWYT Duane 0 Name: droid.dat 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2654.DAT 0 STEP 1 0 -10 -8 0 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 3475.DAT 0 STEP 1 0 10 -8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 3475.DAT 0 STEP 1 0 10 -16 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | alternate for Naboo Starfighter [DAT]
|
|
0 boo2.dat 0 Name: naboo alternate 0 Author: D M Garcia (swlego@aol.com) 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 3032.DAT 1 14 0 -8 -20 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 3795.DAT 1 8 80 -8 20 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 3795.DAT 1 8 -80 -8 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3795.DAT 1 7 0 -16 (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Pod racer 2
|
|
(...) Hey, people ride motorcycles that way! :) I didn't think about the psychological aspect of driving one headfirst; I just wanted to put the driver as low as possible (and in the protective range of the windshield. It wouldn't help much if the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Pod racer 1
|
|
(...) Because I didn't think of continuing the triangle all the way back I also needed to keep the triangle (actually a hexagon) from colapsing. This way, you can still come up with your own idea that's triangular all the way back :) (...) Thanks! (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Pod racer 1
|
|
I really like this one, Bram. I've been envisioning a pod based on a triangle, and here it is. I noticed the back of the pod goes back to a square shape. Why? Great pod in any case. The whole pod race idea really gives rise to creativity. -John Van (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Pod racer 1
|
|
Yikes! I just saw SW EP1 again last night, and the thought of driving one of those things head first at those speeds is a little unnerving! Not that it would really matter which way your body was pointed if you crashed. Head-first would definitely (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: first post
|
|
Very nice model. I'll be interested to see it with the smaller craft added. I hope TLG introduces a 2X4 Very Low Slope Inverted, so we can match it with the new 2X4 regular slope. -John Van D Garcia <swlego@aol.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | first post [DAT]
|
|
Here is my first SW inspired craft. A smaller craft will go inside, which is why it is empty. LMKWYT 0 XT1 0 Name: xt1.dat 0 Author: D M Garcia (swlego@aol.com) 0 1 7 -200 0 170 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 30356.DAT 1 7 120 0 50 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 30356.DAT (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Pickup with Truck Camper [DAT]
|
|
A while ago, I LDrew a similar model, but his time I actually built it and improved greatly on the previous design. Although there is less sleeping room in the bulkhead, there is still room for two people to sleep. The kitchen is also better (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Pod racer 1
|
|
(...) and the subject should reflect that. Oops! Subject should be: MOC Pod @acer 2 --Bram (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | MOC Pod racer 1 [DAT]
|
|
Here's my second Pod racer. I tried to make this one as sleek as possible. Notice the pilot's prone position (if only mini-figs could tilt their heads back :) Please LMKWYT! --Bram 0 FILE pod2.dat 0 MPD Author: Bram Lambrecht 0 0 This .MPD was (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | MOC Pod racer 1 [DAT]
|
|
Now that the SW update has been out for a while, here are my original pod racers. This one goes for the traditional over-powered look. Please LMKWYT! --Bram 0 FILE pod.dat 0 MPD Author: Bram Lambrecht 0 0 This .MPD was compiled using M-Peedy 0 (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Lexington Class space carrier [DAT]
|
|
Just thought I would post the micro scale space carrier I built that would carry my fighters. Making this in minifigure scale would be impossible(for me)to build, so I had to design it in micro scale. This design is alot like the carriers from Wing (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Hornet multi-role fighter
|
|
(...) :-) I had to smile at that. I did the exact same thing when I started out. Finally realized the problem when 'left' and 'front' views did not show me what I wanted. D'Oh! -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
