|
|
 | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| (...) I really enjoy seeing your renderings. You have some mighty impressive castle stuff on your pages. Keep it up! :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| (...) That's much better, however, even in L3LAB, the hands don't attach to the arms. How can I fix it? I really enjoying rendering these images for my desktop wallpaper. -Chuck (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| (...) Try viewing it with LDLite or L3Lab. The minifig was made using LDao's Minifig Modeler, which spits out code with LDLite language extensions. MLCAD and L3P don't recognize the LDLite commands, so they render incorrectly. BTW: the newest (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Arm size an issue? (Was: YAL: Yet Another Loader :))
|
| (...) LOL -- Barbara's first words after seeing my loader were, "it's a crab? no, is it a gorilla?" I think that means the arms were too big. :-, (...) Yah, it does seem silly to put such large arms on a walking loader. The arms I put on mine, and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| I love the loader, but the minifig seems to hav had a melt down. When I load it into mlcad, or convert it with L3P, the minifig parts are all stacked on top of each other like they were not transformed or rotated. Is anyone else seing this? -Chuck (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
