 | | MPD file for Technic #8842
|
|
In this post (URL) you can find the mpd file describing the #8842 Technic set of the 80’s. I decide to remake the model after I read the post in The NXT Step: (URL) which explains some methods to unstuck parts. In a commentary the #8842 is mentioned (...) (16 years ago, 19-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, FTX)
|
| |
| | MPD file for Technic #8274, Combine Harvester
|
|
Hello to everybody! I am modelling the firt model of the set #8274 with MLCad. You can find the actual state of the .mpd file describing the harvester in my SVN server, but the files is still unfinished: (URL) I only need the following parts to (...) (16 years ago, 5-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Couple of queries with LDD exporting
|
|
(...) That's because the history of this DAT goes like this: 1. I wrote the part, it was officially released as 553.dat in 2000. 2. The real part number was discovered, and the part was moved from 553 to 30367. 3. There hasn't been another parts (...) (16 years ago, 23-Jan-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Couple of queries with LDD exporting
|
|
(...) This is most likely caused by the export not using high enough precision in it's calculations. I'm guessing you can probably replace all these with zero. ROSCO (16 years ago, 23-Jan-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Couple of queries with LDD exporting [DAT]
|
|
(...) Right, done that and got rid of the errors, thanks for pin-pointing the location. Strangely all the 'missing' primitives were already in the .mpd file. I've also got rid of 553.dat There does seem to be a strangeness about 30367.dat (Cylinder (...) (16 years ago, 23-Jan-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
