 | | Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
Hi all, Just thought I'd check to see if anyone was working on part 32475 ((URL) It's a horrid part to work on so I'm hoping someone has but realise it's probably unlikely. Thanks, Tim (19 years ago, 27-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) You are right, but there are only three lines of code (easily created with MLCad) that would be substituted with such a new primitive. I think it is not worth. cu mikeheide (19 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) OK, I sent an updated version to the tracker admins, and BFCd it while I was at it. --Travis (19 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) Perhaps if there was a unit capped cylinder in the primitives authors would not be driven to use studs? Philo (19 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
(...) OK, I'll do that (no votes yet...) (...) I agree. Philo (19 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
