 | | Re: 3rd Party Applications and Parts Generation
|
|
That would be fantastic. I've downloaded the rhino evaluation version so I can take a look at your original model file. Please send to karl@blackdown.com. Thanks! Karl (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 3rd Party Applications and Parts Generation
|
|
(...) I use Rhino for some of the more compicalted parts and then convert with STL2DAT. I'll send you the file for one of my parts if your program of choice can import 3dm or stl files. -Orion (24 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New MPD: Harley-Davidson Hovercycle
|
|
(...) might want to try using LGEO parts to avoid, for one, the gaps in the radar dishes. Good luck! --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: New MPD: Harley-Davidson Hovercycle
|
|
(...) Well, now I have to sort them... (...) Enjoy! (...) Yes, the Esprit is probably next in line. Should be pretty easy too. --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | 3rd Party Applications and Parts Generation
|
|
How many of you out there are using third party applications such as 3d studio max or lightwave to generate ldraw parts and then converting them back to dat files? If so, are there examples of your work prior to conversion? Thanks, Karl (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New MPD: Harley-Davidson Hovercycle
|
|
(...) I made a render of this file to test out some POV ideas and thought I'd share it with everyone. (URL) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: New MPD: Harley-Davidson Hovercycle
|
|
Isn't it nice to get parts back? I've Been at a loss for something to build lately, now I can play around with three of your models. BTW, any chance you might do the Esprit? I did it a few days ago from the pics and I'm curious how close I got. Gary (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
(...) *sigh* Like I said in another post in this thread: That's from a manufacturer's point of view, it has absolutely no practical use at all for the builder. On the contrary, it just makes unnecessarly complicated and confusing. But thanks for the (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion on parts 3008p01 and 3008p02
|
|
(...) Me too, that's why I suggested it. :o) (...) That's perfectly ok with me. /Tore (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion on parts 3008p01 and 3008p02
|
|
(...) I like the use of the moved-to file to reposition the part. :) But there are a number of codes used for Red Cross patterns already. Instead of pt1 and pt2, how about p24 and p25? (...) Yep, like that. Steve (24 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
