 | | Technic Shock Absorber 6.5L
|
|
Hello all, How likely is it this (reworked) part will be in the next (<6mnts or so) official library? Cause I'm working on realtime spring generation in my LD4DStudio project and would really like to include a sample using these (classic) shocks (...) (17 years ago, 12-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Request part 31367 (Duplo Container Egg Base)
|
|
Hello all, Is there a parts author in posession of the part who can author it? Duplo Container Egg Base (URL) Bliss did a wonderful job for me years ago creating the top of the egg ((URL) that never made it to parts tracker (could be submitted (...) (17 years ago, 5-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) This type of primitive would mostly be used in places where a cylinder appears between two other objects. One example would be the subpart at: (URL) currently uses 4-4cylc.dat where a 4-4cylo.dat (cylinder with edges open at both ends) would (...) (17 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Guess I replied way too soon. I may revise my earlier reply after giving it some more thought. A 1/4 cylinder with both ends closed would of course be better for rounded cornerns. A cylinder with both ends open could be useful when making (...) (17 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) 4-4 and 2-4 cylc are released, 1-4 and 3-4cylc are already on PT. (...) I think the usefulness is quite low indeed. Philo (17 years ago, 3-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) A cylinder with one closed end (4-4cylc.dat) was issued in the latest parts update (2009-02). See (URL) . If there is a need for a 1-4cylc.dat, feel free to submit it to the Parts Tracker. However, I'm struggling to see the utility of a (...) (17 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Naming is not an important issue to me. Either name would be fine for me. The one important thing for me is that it doesn't mess up with renderers and utilities that make primitive substitutions. But I don't see that there should be any risk (...) (17 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Seems OK to me, but I don't like "circular" too much. Rounded, perhaps? Philo (17 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic ball joint socket naming
|
|
(...) Hmm.. maybe I should really think another three dozen times more about what I propose. 32174.dat - Technic Ball Socket Single 3 x 2 Circular 47296.dat - Technic Ball Socket Single 3 x 2 Rectangular 47296.dat - Technic Ball Socket Double 5 x 2 (...) (17 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Not being a part author, I can't comment on the utility, but to me the naming is confusing. The base cylinder primitives are already open at both ends; they just don't have edges there. So to me, cyle would make more since in the filename, and (...) (17 years ago, 2-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
