 | | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ... —Jason S. Mantor
| | | | I just did a double take : ) YEA, vertex lists ! I was working up to proposing just this sort of addition to the standard. Since these already exist can they be grandfathered into the 1.0 document that Orion has prepared ? -JSM PS. I was so annoyed (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ... —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Uh, you might want to recheck that enthusiasm. Right now, AFAIK (and I haven't double-checked, so you might want to try it), *only* LDLite will render all of the LDLite meta-statements. They definitely are not allowable in parts submitted for (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ... —Steve Bliss
| | | | | | (...) Sorry, one more addition: You can use LDAO to translate any LDL[1] file to straight LDR[2]. So create your parts in the vertex-list-friendly style, then convert them for the rest of the world. :) Steve 1) LDraw files with LDLite language (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ... —Don Heyse
| | | | | (...) But doesn't LDLite have have a command line switch (-R) to convert the LDLite meta-statements to ordinary LDRAW syntax? So you could submit the converted parts. Don (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ... —Paul Gyugyi
| | | | | (...) Yep, and it got broken in a past version. Should be working in the newest version. If not, drop me a note. If you asked me how to change the .LDR format, I would not know where to begin. I view almost every single command, directory structure, (...) (21 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
