 | | Re: We should create a 973c01.dat —Erik Olson
| | | | I was just studying the minifig hips shortcut and had a thought. Would it have been a good idea or not to use a subfile for the "studs" on minifig hips? The question is really what justifies a subfile? I'm slowly making my bounding box code smarter, (...) (22 years ago, 27-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: We should create a 973c01.dat —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Hmm. It might make sense to make a stud primitive for the minifig hips studs. But probably not a subfile. OTOH, there's only one part that uses the minifig-hip-stud. So a primitive is not really justified. (...) Ah. Yes, I could see how that (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
