 | | Question about BFC —Marek Idec
|
| | | Dear All, Before I sent my first part to you ((URL) I tried to verify its conformity with BFC. During this investigation I found out that sub-part s\3069bs01.dat, which I used in my patterned part, is actually not BFC compliant. Main problem I think (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Question about BFC —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Oooh! Lemmee answer! Steve B was kind enough to help me out on pretty much this exact question a few days ago. If you use the statement: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 -24 0 0 0 20 box5.dat 0 the box will be visible from within, but not (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Question about BFC —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Ding ding ding! Points for Dave! (...) It all started in a small village, far away in a forgotten mountain... Steve (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Question about BFC —Marek Idec
|
| | | | (...) Thanks a lot, Dave! I've just send to Steve new, modified by me, 3069bs01.dat to Steve. I hope that I didn't make any mistake and my version of that file is BFC compliant. Marek (22 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
