 | | Re: pictures at tracker —Ross Crawford
| | | | (...) And thinking about it, I don't really think images for sub-parts & primitives would be super useful - generally these would be certified in conjunction with a part which references them, no? ROSCO (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: pictures at tracker —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Sort of. Primitives should stand alone, and not be considered intimately tied to the file(s) which use them. And it's still useful to see what the subparts look like, especially when the descriptive title is somewhat undescriptive. Steve (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
