 | | Re: A really dumb question... —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | (...) No. (...) No. - A good reason to help verifying the quality of the not-yet-canonical LDraw parts at: (URL) well, Jacob (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A really dumb question... —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | | (...) they are allowed. Dave Schuler may have been unsure of the proper interpretation of the statement he quoted, but I wasn't (at least not before your reply). It unequivocally states that unofficial parts are ok, but only if that part isn't yet (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A really dumb question... —Mark Chittenden
|
| | | | | | Ok, I see this as: Unofficial LDRAW Parts (dats) ok - they just have to exist as LEGO (bricks) Parts. I think a case in point is a month ago or so was a model/scene that was using the new/not yet official HORSE (dat) pieces. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A really dumb question... —Paul Easter
|
| | | | (...) I disagree, Unofficial parts have been used in many of the pictures submitted for the contests. The only time I believe that they should not be accepted is if the unofficial part is not available for others to use. Clone parts should never be (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
