 | | Re: Next version of LDAO —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) What you've described is more-or-less what I'm planning on adding to the Inliner. (...) Except right now, the Editor probably deselects the code after inlining. This will be fixed in the next release. BTW, do you have any idea how big (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Next version of LDAO —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | (...) Just look at an L3P output file to get an idea of how huge. And L3P doesn't even inline many of the primitives. -John Van (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Next version of LDAO —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) Cool! (...) I have a 26-line (1.53 kb) model which inlined into a 26,000-line (1.16 Mb) model. (1) Almost exactly three orders of magnatude in this case! But the nice part is, it's not excess baggage. This is as trim as the model gets. It (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
