Subject:
|
Re: Datsville: Cars
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:44:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
427 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Joachim Probst writes:
> Hi ,
>
> I would suggest a little standardization of the width of cars. When I'm
> right there are "small" personal cars with 8 studs width and on the
> other side trucks with only 4 studs width....
>
> What about 6 studs for trucks and 4 -6 studs for transporter like and
> personal cars? I think it would look better...
If we did that, we'd also have to make a standard for buildings(1). That would
mean we'd lose some participation (on either issue). It also means people ho
want ideas for other scales would stop looking to Datsville for ideas. And
that is a Bad Thing.
Jeff
1 - Compare the scales of a six-wide car and a classic-scale house. A little
out of proportion, hmmm? :)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Datsville: Cars
|
| Hi , at 22.09.99 Jeff Stembel wrote in a mail: JS> If we did that, we'd also have to make a standard for buildings(1). JS> That would mean we'd lose some participation (on either issue). JS> It also means people ho want ideas for other scales would (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Datsville: Cars
|
| Hi , I would suggest a little standardization of the width of cars. When I'm right there are "small" personal cars with 8 studs width and on the other side trucks with only 4 studs width.... What about 6 studs for trucks and 4 -6 studs for (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
