 | | Re: Primitives and long file names —Joerg Sommerer
|
| | | (...) Most extreme will be this with a radius >100 e.g. 11-48120. You will never know if this is a ring or cone or whatever. (...) This should be practicable for existing parts when you are restricted to 8 characters (e.g. by using DOS - see the (...) (13 years ago, 7-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Primitives and long file names —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | (...) to make workarounds for the DOS enviroment. With primitives however, having to do so will become much more painfull and problematic. (13 years ago, 9-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Primitives and long file names —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) The plus for primitives is that they don't have to be human readable. It's possible to develop a system which more than covers the full range without breaking 8 characters. For example we use up to four characters (eg. 3-16) for fractions (...) (13 years ago, 9-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Primitives and long file names —Michael Horvath
|
| | | | (...) As long as you provide parts authors with a cheat sheet, this should work too. Regardless, the naming scheme should be according to a regular system. -Mike (13 years ago, 28-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Primitives and long file names —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) And a piece of software to cheat with :) Tim (13 years ago, 28-Mar-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
