Computer Aided Design : 17350


CAD / 17350	17349 \| 17351

Subject:	Re: Bioncile part naming
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad
Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:29:59 GMT
Viewed:	20605 times

Michael Heidemann wrote: > In lugnet.cad, Santeri Piippo wrote: > > <http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=60896> > > <http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=87796> > So in this case it might be a "Technic Connector" > in both cases. Isn't the primary connection the Ball Joint & Socket? Shouldn't that come into the name? -- Anders Isaksson

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Bioncile part naming
(...) The parts you are showing are not identically! So in this case this problem does not arise but it is still there. I am against a big renaming and I like your suggestion. But why should we use "Technic Figure"? Because it is used in figures? No (...) (14 years ago, 12-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search