 | | Re: Bioncile part naming —Michael Heidemann
| | | | (...) The parts you are showing are not identically! So in this case this problem does not arise but it is still there. I am against a big renaming and I like your suggestion. But why should we use "Technic Figure"? Because it is used in figures? No (...) (14 years ago, 12-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Bioncile part naming —Anders Isaksson
| | | | | (...) Isn't the primary connection the Ball Joint & Socket? Shouldn't that come into the name? (14 years ago, 13-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
