 | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) Welcome back. My issue with that is that it's out of the hands of LDraw. It's hard to expect the people responsible for LUGNET to make big changes when it's pretty much just one small section that is active. Tim (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Nod. But if the people responsible for LUGNET don't want it to gradually fade away and become even less relevant, changes are needed. Without them, other sections won't return either. I note that there's a facebook discussion group started on (...) (15 years ago, 21-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Patrick Charette
|
| | | | (...) Lugnet would need to be simpler... It can't compete with modern social networks and user friendly picture-hosting websites. Basically, that would imply A LOT of work while keeping everything free... (15 years ago, 24-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | Wow. It's been a while since a thread here broke the 100 dot limit I think... ROSCO (15 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
