Subject:
|
Re: The future of LDraw?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:41:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
24218 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
>
> > Welcome back. My issue with that is that it's out of the hands of LDraw. It's
> > hard to expect the people responsible for LUGNET to make big changes when it's
> > pretty much just one small section that is active.
>
> Nod. But if the people responsible for LUGNET don't want it to gradually fade
> away and become even less relevant, changes are needed. Without them, other
> sections won't return either.
>
> I note that there's a facebook discussion group started on this topic.
Lugnet would need to be simpler... It can't compete with modern social networks
and user friendly picture-hosting websites. Basically, that would imply A LOT
of work while keeping everything free...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Nod. But if the people responsible for LUGNET don't want it to gradually fade away and become even less relevant, changes are needed. Without them, other sections won't return either. I note that there's a facebook discussion group started on (...) (15 years ago, 21-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
