Subject:
|
Re: The future of LDraw?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:30:27 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
24640 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
> Welcome back. My issue with that is that it's out of the hands of LDraw. It's
> hard to expect the people responsible for LUGNET to make big changes when it's
> pretty much just one small section that is active.
Nod. But if the people responsible for LUGNET don't want it to gradually fade
away and become even less relevant, changes are needed. Without them, other
sections won't return either.
I note that there's a facebook discussion group started on this topic.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Lugnet would need to be simpler... It can't compete with modern social networks and user friendly picture-hosting websites. Basically, that would imply A LOT of work while keeping everything free... (15 years ago, 24-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Welcome back. My issue with that is that it's out of the hands of LDraw. It's hard to expect the people responsible for LUGNET to make big changes when it's pretty much just one small section that is active. Tim (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
