 | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | --snip-- (...) I must admit that I hadn't realised it was so hard to post now. That, IMO, means we need somewhere new to discuss LDraw. If new people can't easily post in discussions then we are killing fresh discussion and that is a very bad move. (...) (15 years ago, 19-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Or perhaps LUGNET just needs some changes... identify the problem areas and fix them. (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Holy moley! Do you still exist?!? (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Rumors of my disassembly have been greatly exaggerated. (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | | | (...) Hello Lary. I still visit (URL) and (URL) from time to time. If you talk about "gradually fade away"... :-) Though I would still love to get my hands on a few of your "comming soon" set ideas if it happens to happen someday. Fortunately, I (...) (15 years ago, 27-Mar-10, to lugnet.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | (Re)activating Lugnet? (Was: The future of LDraw?) —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | (...) I must admit that I didn't know that it isn't possible to get a membership on Lugnet anymore. That's not good. (...) Luckily I keep plenty of backups - also of mission-critical cookies. (...) Yes. What will it take to allow people to get (...) (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) Welcome back. My issue with that is that it's out of the hands of LDraw. It's hard to expect the people responsible for LUGNET to make big changes when it's pretty much just one small section that is active. Tim (15 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Nod. But if the people responsible for LUGNET don't want it to gradually fade away and become even less relevant, changes are needed. Without them, other sections won't return either. I note that there's a facebook discussion group started on (...) (15 years ago, 21-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Patrick Charette
|
| | | | (...) Lugnet would need to be simpler... It can't compete with modern social networks and user friendly picture-hosting websites. Basically, that would imply A LOT of work while keeping everything free... (15 years ago, 24-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | Wow. It's been a while since a thread here broke the 100 dot limit I think... ROSCO (15 years ago, 25-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
