To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 16664 (-10)
  Re: LGPL Datsville
 
I plan on using your revisions as a basis once more people start coming forward with their permissions. No need to re-invent the wheel. Also, if you would like to become a project member you can make modifications directly to the repository. I think (...) (15 years ago, 24-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LGPL Datsville
 
(...) Please feel free to include my petrol hoses found in _bjwgs51.ldr as used in _bjwgas5.ldr from my unoffocial Datsville files. Rename, inline, and alter at will. It says "Author: Jonathan Wilson", but I think I made the hoses and forgot to (...) (15 years ago, 24-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LGPL Datsville
 
(...) Awesome! I'll try contacting some other people this evening. Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LGPL Datsville
 
Here's a table of models. It includes some new submissions. (URL) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: DATHeader (The Reviewer Tool) Version 3.0
 
(...) I just noticed the following errors in the current version: 1) Traffic light does hold location also on resize. 2) Crashes if no file is loaded and Checkofficial is used 3) Crashes if no file is loaded and Optimize Body is used 4) At file (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LGPL Datsville
 
(...) By no means worse than mine. I'll try to contact Martin Svensson (now Palmberg) about the Post office building. I'm certain he has no objections that we use his work. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part. There are more of them in Datsville. (...) If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not have been submitted to the Tracker. Those (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LGPL Datsville
 
(...) Sorry. I just reread that and it's full of grammar mistakes. Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) Is it an official part? Why isn't it included with the official distribution? Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
 
(...) I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in the calling Type 1 line. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR