 | | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) By no means worse than mine. I'll try to contact Martin Svensson (now Palmberg) about the Post office building. I'm certain he has no objections that we use his work. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part. There are more of them in Datsville. (...) If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not have been submitted to the Tracker. Those (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Sorry. I just reread that and it's full of grammar mistakes. Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) Is it an official part? Why isn't it included with the official distribution? Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in the calling Type 1 line. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
