 | | Useful bug in LEdit? —Terry Keller
|
| | | Hi all, Recently I was informed of an apparent bug in LEdit (Thanks to Jonathan Wilson for finding this) that affects part files with the STUD.dat references capitalized. What happens is that studs in LEdit are always fully rendered if STUD.dat's (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Useful bug in LEdit? —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | (...) how about 174? Also, maybe not as crucial, 299. --Karim (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Useful bug in LEdit? —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | (...) 174 = 4081 299 = 4589 Maybe 4081 could benefit. The lines for the studs are pretty visible, but it wouldn't hurt. I don't think 4589 really needs it too much. The placement and location of the stud is pretty obvious. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Useful bug in LEdit? —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) Great idea! Here are a few that might benefit: 2569 6140 4873 4590 Part 2569 (Antenna whip) doesn't use stud.dat, but it uses some other stud which causes it to be mispositioned, especially on top of a 2433. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Useful bug in LEdit? —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) 2569 does have some problem. I need to look at it further. 6140 maybe useful. OK 4873 yes, definitely. More so than 6140 even. 4590 yes. Thanks, -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
