Subject:
|
Re: Useful bug in LEdit?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Apr 1999 04:33:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
603 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) writes:
> Any suggestions for any other parts that can benefit from this trick?
Great idea! Here are a few that might benefit:
2569
6140
4873
4590
Part 2569 (Antenna whip) doesn't use stud.dat, but it uses some other
stud which causes it to be mispositioned, especially on top of a 2433.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Useful bug in LEdit?
|
| (...) 2569 does have some problem. I need to look at it further. 6140 maybe useful. OK 4873 yes, definitely. More so than 6140 even. 4590 yes. Thanks, -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Useful bug in LEdit?
|
| Hi all, Recently I was informed of an apparent bug in LEdit (Thanks to Jonathan Wilson for finding this) that affects part files with the STUD.dat references capitalized. What happens is that studs in LEdit are always fully rendered if STUD.dat's (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
