 | | DATHeader version 2.0.4 for WINDOWS, LINUX and MAC
|
|
And here is the next release of DATHeader. The following happend: 1) Some more adjustments to recognize part type correctly 2) If EDIT commands used the current file will be unloaded. 3) Notify about wrong colors now without separate messages 4) (...) (16 years ago, 31-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP current version - BUG?
|
|
(...) I don't think so, as the official document ((URL) reads like this: Line Type 2 Line type 2 is a line drawn between two points. The generic format is: 2 <colour> x1 y1 z1 x2 y2 z2 Where: * <colour> is a number representing the colour of the (...) (16 years ago, 31-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP current version - BUG?
|
|
(...) Concave is not the same as co-planer. Co-planarity checks to see if all the points in the quad lie on the same plane (with in some tolerance). You can have a co-planer, concave quad. (...) Those are illegal type 2 lines as they have 3 points (...) (16 years ago, 31-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP current version - BUG? [DAT]
|
|
(...) I just checked an LDView reports concave quads. Can somebody explain that to me, as I believed it can be checked with planarcheck, but co-planarity is ok. One other thing. At part (URL) LDDP does not find any double lines. But there are double (...) (16 years ago, 31-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP current version - BUG?
|
|
(...) I just checked this part. The 2 lines in question look to be concave in LDView. -Orion (16 years ago, 31-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDDP current version - BUG?
|
|
I just came across the following problem. For part (URL) LDDP generate 2 error regarding planarity. Planarcheck does not. Anybody with similar experience? cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 30-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath wrote: <SNIP> (...) Yes, the original design was British, so used imperial units. Chris (16 years ago, 25-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion: !TYPE line
|
|
(...) Sounds logical, but if we would have that in this way we just could go and hard color the part. At this point you should not be so narrow to the real part. In our part files there should be only the geometric data defined. The color is defined (...) (16 years ago, 29-May-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Suggestion: !TYPE line
|
|
LEGO parts may vary in colour and pattern, but they are always of the same material. For example, there is no such thing as a Technic Axle 7 made of rubber or the Axle Flexible 7 that's solid, is there? Here I got an idea: have parts identify what (...) (16 years ago, 29-May-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for dimensions of LEGO bricks.
|
|
(...) I was aware of the Kiddiecraft connection, and that TLC bought all the remaining rights from them at some point, but I thought the original Automatic Binding Bricks were a legally licensed copy/variation of the Kiddiecraft bricks. If they (...) (16 years ago, 28-May-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
