Special:
|
[DAT] (requires LDraw-compatible viewer)
|
Subject:
|
Re: LDraw Design Pad v2.0 Beta 2
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:45:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10889 times
|
| |
|
|
> > It works for linetype 1. Typing the file reference should bring up the auto
> > complete box if you have the ldraw base path set.
>
> Don't seem to be working here. You mean if I begin typing 4-4ed... it should
> propose 4-4edge.dat?
Grrrrr... now I feel really dumb: it works perfectly now. Will be really helpful
figuring out the exact spelling of some primitives!
> I think there is something broken in your angle calculation, but I'll come back
> later on this, I need to experiment more.
...but this one is confirmed, test data below.
4 16 20 -15.9343 -5.35757 15 -20.5537 -7.27099 15 -18 -11 20 -13 -10
1 16 12 -3 -3 0 1 0 0 0 -1 1 0 0 rect.dat
4 16 15 -22 0 20 -17 0 20 -15.9346 5.3578 15 -20.5541 7.2713
1 16 12 -4 -3 0 1 0 0 0 -1 1 0 0 4-4disc.dat
5 24 20 -8.3578 12.9346 15 -10.2713 17.5541 15 -3 19 20 -12.8994 9.8994
4 16 22 -20.5537 -7.27099 27 -15.9343 -5.35757 27 -17 0 22 -22 1
1 16 12 -4 -3 0 1 0 0 0 -1 2 0 0 4-4disc.dat
4 16 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 0 0
First issue: Quads line 1 and 6 are slightly warped, 2° and 1.4° according to
Planarcheck. LDDP finds an angle of 20° and 13°. Last line quad is badly
distorted (60°), LDDP reports a whooping 592° angle ;o)
Second issue: if you comment out type 1 lines, LDDP reports the same angle (20°)
for all quads (including the flat one), and also for the conditional line.
Philo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw Design Pad v2.0 Beta 2
|
| (...) Actually your input revealed that this functionality was slightly broken and has now been fixed. (...) Yep, you're right. I went back and compared my code with yours and discovered that I was doing this: Angle1 := (...) (18 years ago, 3-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw Design Pad v2.0 Beta 2
|
| (...) Don't seem to be working here. You mean if I begin typing 4-4ed... it should propose 4-4edge.dat? (...) I would choose the triangles with lowest angle (as I did in planarcheck): the overall shape will be flatter visually. I think there is (...) (18 years ago, 1-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
