 | | Re: Another part review question - about headers
|
| (...) Thanks, Steve. I wasn't sure there even were issues with the header - I was just looking for example reviews, and trying to figure out what purpose, if any, the specifications play. Jim (18 years ago, 17-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Another part review question - about headers
|
| (...) If the header is the only problem, certifying is fine -- just note the issue, so the admins can clean up the header later. If it's a question of the header's content (ie, "is that the right title?", etc), then you might go for novote. (...) (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Another part review question - about headers
|
| (...) Hi Willy, Thanks for the background. So, if the header just needs to be cleaned up, you recommend novote with a note about the header format? If I can ask for one more example, how would you respond to a header like this? 0 Car Mudguard 4 1/2 (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LPub4 Alpha3 available
|
| (...) This has been fixed. (...) This has been fixed. (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LPub4 Alpha3 available
|
| (...) Right! Found that. Tnx! (18 years ago, 16-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
