 | | Part review coplanarity check
|
|
As a rookie part reviewer, I'd like to check whether I understand the guidelines for this situation before casting a vote. The (URL) L3P -check guide> suggests different coplanarity determinant test thresholds for general files (0.1) and primitives (...) (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
|
(...) Hello Jim, L3P coplanarity checks have some problems (they depend on the size of polygon, some explainations here: (URL) So coplanarity criteria has been updated ((URL) but guidelines were not. So the tool to use is Planarcheck. Philo (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
|
(...) Some weeks ago we discussed this issues in the LSC. We came to the solution that these tools are not doing what we thinking about. Philo has written then a tool that is at present the state of the art (I hope this is correct english). Please (...) (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
|
(...) Hi Philo, Ah - thanks for the clarification. Now I know what to do with one of those program I compiled! Bit by bit I am figuring out the review procedure. Jim (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
|
(...) ;o) (...) Welcome among reviewers - your help is appreciated! Philo (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
|
(...) Someone should ping the PT-Admins and make sure the L3P -check guide gets updated accordingly. w. (16 years ago, 16-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
