Subject:
|
Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:52:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5025 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Jim DeVona wrote:
| |
As a rookie part reviewer, I’d like to check whether I understand the
guidelines for this situation before casting a vote.
The L3P -check guide
suggests different coplanarity determinant test thresholds for general files
(0.1) and primitives (0.01 or 0.001).
I’m looking at part
50947, which
raises two “Vertices not coplanar” warnings with -det0.01. However, since
this part is not a primitive, and since it passes -det0.1 without complaint,
a “hold” vote is not required - correct? (At least as far as coplanarity is
concerned.)
If not, is it helpful to mention things like this in review comments anyway?
Thanks,
Jim
|
Some weeks ago we discussed this issues in the LSC. We came to the solution that
these tools are not doing what we thinking about. Philo has written then a tool
that is at present the state of the art (I hope this is correct english). Please
see http://www.philohome.com/isecalc/planarcheck.htm This is written in the
specification for restriction for official parts at
http://www.ldraw.org/Article512.html
cu
mikeheide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Part review coplanarity check
|
| As a rookie part reviewer, I'd like to check whether I understand the guidelines for this situation before casting a vote. The (URL) L3P -check guide> suggests different coplanarity determinant test thresholds for general files (0.1) and primitives (...) (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
