Subject:
|
Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:41:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9416 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Jim DeVona wrote:
> > As a rookie part reviewer, I'd like to check whether I understand the
> > guidelines for this situation before casting a vote.
> >
> > The <http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/l3pmsg/#note2 L3P -check guide>
> > suggests different coplanarity determinant test thresholds for general files
> > (0.1) and primitives (0.01 or 0.001).
>
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> L3P coplanarity checks have some problems (they depend on the size of polygon,
> some explainations here: http://www.philohome.com/isecalc/planarcheck.htm). So
> coplanarity criteria has been updated
> (http://www.ldraw.org/Article512.html#coplanar) but guidelines were not. So the
> tool to use is Planarcheck.
>
> Philo
Hi Philo,
Ah - thanks for the clarification. Now I know what to do with one of those
program I compiled!
Bit by bit I am figuring out the review procedure.
Jim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
| (...) Hello Jim, L3P coplanarity checks have some problems (they depend on the size of polygon, some explainations here: (URL) So coplanarity criteria has been updated ((URL) but guidelines were not. So the tool to use is Planarcheck. Philo (18 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
