 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) While I agree with Willy's assessment that it may be time to move on to ldview for the part tracker, I did run a quick test and it looks like ldglite does support modified colors like 71 or 72 with the ldliterc.dat file. Perhaps the location (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) than we should start thinking about the switch to LDView as render engine ... if this is technically doable. to be frank I didn't understand a single word from all the tech speech above: x server or not, OSMesa a mess ... Travis, I guess you (...) (19 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) Nope, sorry. No update. As far as I can tell, ldglite[1] won't recognize colors like 71 and 72. (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDMerge 1.0
|
|
LDMerge is a console tool for managing multiple LDraw part libraries. It permits the contents of one or more library to be merged into another library and subsequently unmerged with minimum hassle. (URL) works with Mac OS X, Windows, and other (...) (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
Hello Steve, (...) Any news about this? I have submitted a new part with the same color scheme ((URL) problem remains :-( Philo (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
It has been more than a year since the last election of the LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC). Nominations are now open. All nominations must be received and recorded by October 14. Elections will be held from October 17 ‘til October 31. The (...) (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | Voting for "Model Of The Month" is now open
|
|
Hi folks, we've a new round of models and parts in our MOTM contest. Have a look at: (URL) cast your vote! Willy Tschager LDraw Administration Team (19 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: LPUB question
|
|
(...) Thanks David! I used the second option, and works fine! Ludo (19 years ago, 29-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with Primitive Generator
|
|
(...) Yes, that's the way cylinder primitives are done, and it seems to work very well. I think other primitives could be improved that way. (...) That case is not that bad - the angle where the middle line appears is divided by two, so it is an (...) (19 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with Primitive Generator
|
|
(...) I think a solution that mostly works was invented around this time frame: (URL) of using cylinder primitives with an optional line at one end that expects to be mated with a similar cylinder primitive, you use optional lines at both ends that (...) (19 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
