 | | Re: Old Dithered Colors —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | (...) I definitely think MLCad should continue to recognize the color numbers. When I wrote LDView, I decided not to dither the colors, and just calculate the final color. I really think this is the best way to go (at least if the display is true (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jul-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Old Dithered Colors —Michael Lachmann
|
| | | | "Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:J2B0n8.4IB@lugnet.com... (...) That was what I was thinking of. I still will support the color codes as such, but I think that I will stop support for defining dithered colors. (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jul-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Old Dithered Colors —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, when I read your first message, I thought you meant MLCad would no longer support the predefined colors 256-511. Using derived values instead of literally dithering is just fine, I agree. Steve (18 years ago, 12-Jul-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Old Dithered Colors —Michael Lachmann
|
| | | | "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@sbcglobal.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:J2B4o1.AwD@lugnet.com... (...) Great then I will follow this way! Thank you all! Michael (18 years ago, 13-Jul-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
