 | | Re: SW MicroFig Model: Slave 1
|
|
(...) I am glad you're not showing off. That would be unprofessional. Though it begs the question, what would you come up with if you were _trying_ to show off? :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 19-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SW MicroFig Model: Slave 1 [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hmmmm, how about this: (You should not have asked....:^P ) ---...--- 0 Name: XWING.DAT 0 Author: Karim Nassar 1 7 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 3710.DAT 1 4 0 0 -20 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 3710.DAT 1 7 0 -16 30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6541.DAT 1 7 0 -8 10 1 (...) (26 years ago, 19-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dat)
|
| |
| | Re: SW MicroFig Model: Slave 1
|
|
(...) bottom line... karim nassar is a *god* J (bowing humbly) (26 years ago, 19-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SW MicroFig Model: Slave 1
|
|
(...) Wow, wow, wow, and ...(counting)... wow. One note, though, Karim: multiple models in the same message don't work too well in the .cad.dat newsgroup. Any wau you could re-post those four in separate messages? The snowspeeder and AT-ST also? (...) (26 years ago, 19-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SW MicroFig Model: Slave 1
|
|
(...) Oh, OK. I didn't know that. I'll repost them seperately. BTW, I realized that the version of the Y-Wing that I posted was the wrong file... I accidentally posted a working file that i was using as a study... who can point out the (...) (26 years ago, 19-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SW MicroFig Model: Slave 1
|
|
(...) Coolness! :-, Thanks. (...) I think I got it. It needed a nose job, right? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 19-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SW MicroFig Model: Slave 1
|
|
(...) Hehehe, Looks like the prize goes to Jeremy :) I've already sent him his prize. The answer is, "It isn't" This was a working file that I used to create studies for all 4 ships and i did the Y-wing last. I just slapped pieces together to figure (...) (26 years ago, 19-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
