 | | Re: LPub 2.3.0.2 available (was: LPub 2.3 available) —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | (...) Actually, I added a MessageBox call to the very beginning of LDView so that I could attach a debugger. It never showed up, and L3P ran and generated POV files, so I really don't think it's running LDView for me. (...) I'll take a look. (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | LPub and LDView working better. It looks awesome! —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | (...) <snip> (...) I fixed a few LPub problems with LDView, and got some instructions out. They look great! It seems that there are some problems with LSynth hoses and LDView. They render nicely under the offical LDView, but not under beta. Except (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | LPub and LDView working better. It looks awesome! —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) I fixed a few LPub problems with LDView, and got some instructions out. They look great! It seems that there are some problems with LSynth hoses and LDView. They render nicely under the offical LDView, but not under beta. Except (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPub and LDView working better. It looks awesome! —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) new LSynth soon so people can have this fix. Travis sent me a updated beta LDView, so I re-rendered pedmatic, and all the hoses look great. IMHO, LDView (and soon ldglite) is a superior solution to POV-RAY and MEGAPOV. The MEGAPOV solution is (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPub and LDView working better. It looks awesome! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) If you were having trouble getting good renders I certainly could see why you wouldn't like it! But these tired eyes have lots of trouble with instructions even WITH the thick black edge lines. (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPub and LDView working better. It looks awesome! —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | (...) You're welcome. Just to check, LDView still doesn't generate exactly the same viewing angle as L3P, right? (That was next on my list of things to fix.) Also, it's worth noting that the -SaveAlpha=1 command line setting in LDView 3 might have (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPub and LDView working better. It looks awesome! —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | | (...) And what I meant to say, and somehow forgot is that I'll be looking into that as well, and trying to fix it. --Travis (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPub and LDView working better. It looks awesome! —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) It looked good in the pedmatic instructions. (...) Correct. No transparent parts in pedmatic. (...) Kevin (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPub and LDView working better. It looks awesome! —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) I just rendered James' car.dat and it looked good when the transparent parts are in the model with other bricks, but when I render the transparent parts individually for PLIs, they come up blank. Thanks, Kevin (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| | | | |
