 | | Re: Some comments on the LPub 2.2.0.9 beta —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | (...) Before we start, lets talk a bit about where I'm going with LPub. When I release the next LPub, it will also be going open source, as promised. LPub would be better suited to a larger develoment team. Through these conversations, you have (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Some comments on the LPub 2.2.0.9 beta —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | (...) I haven't been able to keep up with this whole discussion, (sorry) but one thing struck me. Once upon a time we tried to put this sort of global config stuff in the generic ldraw.ini file instead an app specific file like mlcad.ini. Here's an (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Program INI files (was: RE: Some comments on the LPub 2.2.0.9 beta) —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | | | (...) I like to add that LDDP, LDAO, and, to some extent, L3PAO use the ldraw.ini file to store program wide settings. I like this approach since it doesn't use the registry (which I abhor) and therefore makes the data easier to find and the program (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Some comments on the LPub 2.2.0.9 beta —Andreas Maier
|
| | | | (...) Thanks for the invitation. I think it may end up to be a time problem, but I see what I can do. (...) I think this hits the nail: We need both to have a complete solution. (...) Thanks for clarifying the terminology. so I was intending to talk (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Some comments on the LPub 2.2.0.9 beta —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) <much snippage> (...) <snip> (...) <much snippage> (...) Really it is the maximum of the minimum camera distances. I've changed it to Min.... <more snippage> (...) Yes. This is where I ended up. It is the temporal nature of building (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
