Subject:
|
Re: Quick way to mirror-image a model?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 00:38:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2676 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Dave Schuler wrote:
> Dumb, dumb, dumb. To be a true "mirror" as you've requested, the second example
> should have read this way:
>
> A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
>
> 1 16 -100 0 -10 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 3001.DAT
>
> The way I originally posted it, the 3001 brick would be flipped left-to-right,
> but it would be at the same location as the non-flipped brick.
>
> Sorry about that.
Wouldn't that still be a 180 degree rotation rather than a flip, since
-1 0 0
(x y z) * 0 1 0 = (-x y -z)
0 0 -1
?
Or am I laying out my rotation matrix incorrectly (is the first line a b c or a
d g)?
Sorry for all the stupid questions, I'm still trying to dredge my linear algebra
out of the dark recesses of my memory.
Thanks,
Carl
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Quick way to mirror-image a model?
|
| (...) When you ask a stupid question, I'll let you know! 8^) You're right--it would rotate the brick 180 degrees, but I think that's necessary sometimes (like for the 2x2 slope bricks mirrored left-to-right). But you're also right that this isn't (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Quick way to mirror-image a model? [DAT]
|
| (...) Dumb, dumb, dumb. To be a true "mirror" as you've requested, the second example should have read this way: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P 1 16 -100 0 -10 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 3001.DAT The way I originally posted it, the 3001 brick would be (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
