Subject:
|
Re: Studa.dat or stretch Stud.dat?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Apr 2004 17:28:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1029 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.cad, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the 2x4 Train Bricks with Holder for Sliding Wheel have 6 LDU
> high studs instead of the regular 4 LDU high studs. Looking at the various stud
> primitives I saw that many studs have an variant without edge around base
> (stud2.dat vs stud2a.dat), but there is no studa.dat.
>
> Is it allowed to scale Stud.dat by 1.5 to get a 6 LDU high stud, or should I
> create a new Studa.dat primitive? (and lowres Stu2a.dat)?
>
> Niels
I would recommend not to stretch stud.dat (for more justification of this
advice, see the primitives reference -
http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/primref/#specstud), but to submit a
studa.dat and stu2a.dat.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Studa.dat or stretch Stud.dat?
|
| Hello, I noticed that the 2x4 Train Bricks with Holder for Sliding Wheel have 6 LDU high studs instead of the regular 4 LDU high studs. Looking at the various stud primitives I saw that many studs have an variant without edge around base (stud2.dat (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![Studa.dat or stretch Stud.dat? -Niels Karsdorp (4-Apr-04 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Studa.dat or stretch Stud.dat? -Mark Kennedy (4-Apr-04 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Studa.dat or stretch Stud.dat? -Niels Karsdorp (4-Apr-04 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|