Subject:
|
Re: Old parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:18:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
427 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Ross Crawford wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
> > What do you think about old and long gone parts to be modelled in LDraw?
> > I have done several old parts (from the fifties-seventies), even some rare parts
> > that can hardly be found (making it hard to be reviewed, too).
>
> Personally I think the more complete the better. I've modelled a couple of 4.5V
> motor parts that probably haven't been used by anyone else, but at least they're
> in there :) I generally only model a part when I need it to document a MOC and
> it's not available yet. But that was one case where I just did it for fun :)
>
> > I just received a train signal <http://guide.lugnet.com/set/5062>
> > Of course I model parts in LDraw because I like to do it, but if the parts are
> > only to wait for ages on the PT (no offend, just kidding ;-) I can wait before
> > starting on the signal.
>
> I think it would be great to have these signals! I have an old broken one but
> definitely good enough to review your part! Go for it!
>
> ROSCO
We are aware that there are problems in getting old or scarce parts through the
review procedure, and Steve and I have talked about alternative processes.
For these parts however, I think you should go ahead - I do have access to
these.
Still no guarantees about how quickly they will get through the Parts Tracker !!
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Old parts
|
| (...) Personally I think the more complete the better. I've modelled a couple of 4.5V motor parts that probably haven't been used by anyone else, but at least they're in there :) I generally only model a part when I need it to document a MOC and (...) (21 years ago, 11-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
