To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 10082
10081  |  10083
Subject: 
Color Definition File (was: Re: Edge line colors on img.lugnet.com)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Tue, 20 May 2003 00:43:11 GMT
Viewed: 
2410 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Andrew Westrate wrote:

> I think that with the next parts update, we should include a "colors.lst"
> file.

That's a great idea!  I've got an ldliterc.dat I could easily add to the
update.  I think you're on the right track, using a more generic name.
How about colors.ldr?

> The format could either be a modified version of the ldlite color
> command [1] or a more detailed format, such as an xml doc, as was mentioned in
> this thread: http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=9830. [2]

Or the format could be the current LDLite COLOR command, since it's
already out there, and supported by a number of programs.

> Obviously no program would support this yet, but at least by including the file
> in the standard parts package, there would be a common list for users to
> consult.  And in future software versions, the file would be used instead of
> colors being hard-coded.  If someone didn't like the name for a color, or
> thought that it was off by a shade, they could edit the file themselves.  And
> it would be easy to add new colors as they are created.

Exactly.

> [1. I say a modified version, because I don't like including a second color for
> dithering.  IMO, the whole point of specifing the color would be to escape the
> need for using dithered colors.

I agree that dithering probably isn't that important, but it's not
exactly a challenge to continue allowing it.  Maybe someone likes the
subtle texture it provides?

> [2. Personally, I think XML is the better way to go, because it would provide
> more options for different materials, edge colors, and so on.  But it would be
> harder to agree on the actual format.]

I'd rather stick with an LDraw-compatible format, for two reasons:

1. It can be treated as a simple include file when rendering models
2. It's simpler to parse without the use of an add-on library.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Edge line colors on img.lugnet.com
 
(...) I've been thinking about this a little bit, and I'd like to propose a solution. I think that with the next parts update, we should include a "colors.lst" file. The format could either be a modified version of the ldlite color command [1] or a (...) (23 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.cad)

18 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR