 | | Re: LDraw Design Pad v2.1 beta
|
|
(...) Not too many surface changes but I changed the whole back end to set up for a possible cross platform port. I'm looking to make sure that all functionality is restored and working as intended. -Orion (14 years ago, 15-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Lego - Anakin's Jedi Starfighter 7669
|
|
Hello everyone! I've created another Lego model based on set 7669 - Anakin's Jedi Starfighter. For details see: (URL) can download the 3D model in various formats (including POV-Ray scene files and ldr file) from the link above. I had to use a (...) (14 years ago, 15-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw Design Pad v2.1 beta
|
|
(...) Philo (14 years ago, 15-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDraw Design Pad v2.1 beta
|
|
Hi all, I'm up from the depths for a few day of R&R in Sasebo, Japan. I've done a lot of work on LDDP in the past weeks. Please try out the beta for LDDP v2.1 found here: (URL) depart soon so if you have any comments, email me. (14 years ago, 15-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2010-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) You're welcome ;o) (...) This is a possibility, using (URL) stl2dat converter>. But the problem with this kind of tools is that it requires careful planning to make good use of (URL) LDraw primitives> that provide compact code and better (...) (14 years ago, 13-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2010-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
Well done to everyone who's contributed to the parts update. Keep up the great work. I've just had a quick browse of the updated parts and I can already see a part I need for my Police Car model - (URL) is the preferred modeling tool for creating (...) (14 years ago, 12-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | SR 3D Builder 0.5.5.1
|
|
Hi everybody, the new release of SR 3D Builder has been published. [b]Now with a basic (really basic) support for flex parts[/b] refer to video for how to use it! Available as always from (URL) (14 years ago, 11-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) Damn! And the whole discussion is too esoteric for me to jump in>:-( JOHN (14 years ago, 10-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2010-02 Parts Update **IMPORTANT REVISION**
|
|
(...) Actually Lars is the real author. I've just done some minor updates because the LEDIT emulator in ldglite needs a parts.lst file. (...) For the one guy still using LEDIT (you know who you are) -8 is all you need. I assumed the only reason (...) (14 years ago, 9-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2010-02 Parts Update **IMPORTANT REVISION**
|
|
(...) The version of mklist.exe packaged with the early versions of this download was not able to cope with long filenames, and running it would not have updated your parts list. With a fast response from Don Heyse (the author of mklist) the (...) (14 years ago, 9-Jul-10, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) To be more precise 'with the legal blessing of the Jessiman's and everyone who has ever contributed a part.' As I pointed out elsewhere in this thread one of the benefits is that someone could release a perfectly legal version of the library (...) (14 years ago, 9-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) Hmm... This is reminding me of deja vu. Did you email me about this, maybe five or six years ago? Okay, okay. I'll give it a try. But if it doesn't chase those pesky kids off of my lawn, I'm going right back to the full-screen obsolescence of (...) (14 years ago, 8-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) I'd agree, if that was the only benefit of the "discussion and hand-wringing", however the primary benefit of it was to get a library that could be freely distributed with the blessing of the Jessimans. (...) I don't see that it does. (...) (...) (14 years ago, 8-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) Ah Ha! I knew it! When I suggested you were probably "still running the original LEDIT program on some ancient 386 ... stashed in an attic somewhere", you only denied the 386 part. You *are* still running LEDIT in somebody's attic! So I know (...) (14 years ago, 8-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) I'm guilty of that blank-space-deletion in my own parts, I confess. I do most of my authoring in Excel, and sometimes it becomes helpful to sort by linetype. This has the effect of stripping out the blank lines or at least moving them around (...) (14 years ago, 7-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) I agree to some extent. But now it's there, like it or not. I have very little (if any?) use of it and yes it annoys me a little. The deleting of extra blank lines (used to group lines some way related to eachother) that makes the dat code a (...) (14 years ago, 7-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2010-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) HUGE thanks, guys!! i've been using ldraw since the beginning and it's always a little exciting to see what new parts are coming out. i've been wrestling with the lego digital designer software (not as an alternative to ldraw but because i (...) (14 years ago, 7-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) For me, the argument comes back to process vs. product, as was discussed in the previous thread. Additionally, it raises the question of whether LDraw is a tool for the end-users or a tool for the reviewers. The extended period of discussion (...) (14 years ago, 7-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Warnings
|
|
(...) I'm intrigued - the only point in that last sentence that differentiates the "indecipherable gobbledygook" from the inline POV is that the latter "yields a greatly superior output image". It's certainly no less invisible to the end-user, nor (...) (14 years ago, 7-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2010-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) Despite indications of a steady - if not increasing - rate of new file submission. The post-CA parts updates have shown a steady trend of reducing the backlog, bravo to Chris and the reviewers and the authors! (...) Thanks for the link. Could (...) (14 years ago, 6-Jul-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
