 | | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) I'm not going to try to convince you one way or another, but it seems to me that if you were to do something like this, Peeron would be a more logical choice as the source of the information, since Peeron and ldraw.org are much more closely (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | MLCad.ini and Unofficial parts
|
|
I'm not sure if I'm missing something... I have a LDraw\Unofficial folder with all the unofficial parts and MLCad.ini with the lines corresponding to the location of those unofficial parts uncommented. I open MLCad, scan for new parts and write a (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
|
(...) I think the best would be to make an upgrade to L3P for current standards, as it is the most used checking tool IMHO. Most of the technical hold reasons are already defined but not present at the mentioned page. I have tried to put all I saw (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
(...) Thank you very much for your feedback. If you follow the discussions made on the parts tracker then you would see that the description that bricklink uses is not in every case a choice that pass the parts tracker certifying process. If ever, I (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update (The Reviewer Tool) Version 2.0.6
|
|
Mike, I have yet to author any parts, but I did download DATHeader and give it a try. It looks like a great program with a lot of great features! There is one thing that I would like to request that you add to DATHeader. I'd like to see DATHeader (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
