 | | Re: Printing LPub instructions with Lulu.com
|
|
(...) Very cool--I love it! To be honest, it would never have occurred to me to use Lulu; I got as far as "I should try Kinkos," and that's where I sort of stalled. I have to say that the end results look amazingly professional and high-quality. (...) (16 years ago, 13-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.inst, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Printing LPub instructions with Lulu.com
|
|
Hi! I recently used (URL) Lulu.com> to publish (URL) LPub> instructions for a (URL) model> I created a few months ago. I have determined that I need to use higher resolution rendering settings and possibly avoid gradient backgrounds for optimal (...) (16 years ago, 13-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.inst, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Setting the right rotation step
|
|
(...) Hi, Jaco. Try using an "absolute" rotstep in the callout submodel to specify exactly the angle you desire. For instance: 0 ROTSTEP 30 45 0 ABS Jim (16 years ago, 13-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PAO 1.9 Beta
|
|
(...) Thanks Scott! I actually had msflxgrd.ocx allready in the system32 folder. Placing sysinfo.ocx there solved the problem even without rebooting! Jaco (16 years ago, 12-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC-ratified change to !COLOUR specification
|
|
(...) Thx to the LSC for ratifying this so quickly. w. (16 years ago, 12-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Setting the right rotation step
|
|
Hi all, Creating buildinginstructions for the birds by MisaQa for my website ((URL) I am having trouble getting the right rotation step for the instructions of one of the swans. It is this one on page 2: (URL) someone help me in getting it right? (...) (16 years ago, 12-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LSC-ratified change to !COLOUR specification
|
|
The LSC just ratified and made changes to the (URL) !COLOUR spec>. There were two changes: MATERIAL is now allowed in official LDraw.org color definitions GLITTER and SPECKLE material properties specified. Please note: these changes were made in (...) (16 years ago, 12-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hollow axles actually not that hollow...
|
|
(...) Geoffrey, if you're looking for a time filler be my guest. There as still some parts in the need for a CA re-write: (URL) also these parts: (URL) looking for gifted people to get dressed up for a PT-party. w. (16 years ago, 7-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Hollow axles actually not that hollow...
|
|
(...) If someone really wants to go to the trouble of making a cross-section, and knows how to do so, adding in the missing surfaces shouldn't be that big a deal, yes? (...) I'd say no. People are clearly already concerned with keeping file size as (...) (16 years ago, 7-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Hollow axles actually not that hollow...
|
|
"Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message news:KG3zI9.Cno@lugnet.com... (...) The computer hasn't been programmed with a representation of "solid" for an internal representation of a LDRAW part, yet. But he brings up an interesting (...) (16 years ago, 7-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
