 | | LSC-ratified change to !COLOUR specification
|
|
The LSC just ratified and made changes to the (URL) !COLOUR spec>. There were two changes: MATERIAL is now allowed in official LDraw.org color definitions GLITTER and SPECKLE material properties specified. Please note: these changes were made in (...) (16 years ago, 12-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hollow axles actually not that hollow...
|
|
(...) Geoffrey, if you're looking for a time filler be my guest. There as still some parts in the need for a CA re-write: (URL) also these parts: (URL) looking for gifted people to get dressed up for a PT-party. w. (16 years ago, 7-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Hollow axles actually not that hollow...
|
|
(...) If someone really wants to go to the trouble of making a cross-section, and knows how to do so, adding in the missing surfaces shouldn't be that big a deal, yes? (...) I'd say no. People are clearly already concerned with keeping file size as (...) (16 years ago, 7-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Hollow axles actually not that hollow...
|
|
"Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message news:KG3zI9.Cno@lugnet.com... (...) The computer hasn't been programmed with a representation of "solid" for an internal representation of a LDRAW part, yet. But he brings up an interesting (...) (16 years ago, 7-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Hollow axles actually not that hollow...
|
|
It's a computer representation of the piece, it's not meant to show how it's actually constructed. -Stefan- (16 years ago, 7-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
