 | | Reminder: 2007/2008 LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) Election closing tomorrow
|
|
Hi folks, As outlined here: (URL) election will close tomorrow, at 23:59 EDT (GMT -0500), October 31, 2007. Willy Tschager On behalf of the LDraw.org Steering Committee (19 years ago, 30-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Previous step color scaling
|
|
(...) Well, that's what LPub does, right? Anyway, PreL3P should work at a Windows DOS prompt (or whatever you call it), so the PreL3P-LDView technique we talk about here should be possible in Windows. The shell script does require unix or cygwin, (...) (19 years ago, 30-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Previous step color scaling
|
|
And how can one create building instructions without access to a *nix machine (what is that anyway :-) and no cygwin components on a Windows PC? I am desperately looking for a way to create smooth building step images top view for a very large (...) (19 years ago, 30-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) You're right. My mistake. -Orion (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) I don't know what LEGO color T182 is, but based on Philippe's title, I'm guessing it's the (relatively) new trans orange (non-fluorescent). Assuming this is the case, then color 57 isn't it. --Travis (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) Per the ldconfig.ldr ((URL) file, color 57 is correct. -Orion (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, the current 2609 should be renamed to 2609a. cu mikeheide (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, maybe this (URL) helps. I only have one part and that has also a groove. On the pictures also only parts with groove are shown. So maybe it has always grooves. cu mikeheide (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
(...) As I'm rewriting 2609 to make use of a load more primitives, is there a version of either of these without the groove? The current LDraw part doesn't but all my real pieces do. (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 2609b
|
|
Hi all. I have a magnet holder labelled 2609 but is about 4 LDU taller than the current part. Shall I just submit it as 2609b and what needs to be done with the current 2609? Thanks (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
