 | | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) Per the ldconfig.ldr ((URL) file, color 57 is correct. -Orion (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, the current 2609 should be renamed to 2609a. cu mikeheide (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, maybe this (URL) helps. I only have one part and that has also a groove. On the pictures also only parts with groove are shown. So maybe it has always grooves. cu mikeheide (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
(...) As I'm rewriting 2609 to make use of a load more primitives, is there a version of either of these without the groove? The current LDraw part doesn't but all my real pieces do. (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 2609b
|
|
Hi all. I have a magnet holder labelled 2609 but is about 4 LDU taller than the current part. Shall I just submit it as 2609b and what needs to be done with the current 2609? Thanks (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
How should LEGO color T182 be coded? These parts: (URL) Ldraw color 57 but this is not correct... Philo (19 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Reminder: 2007/2008 LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) Election closing in a week
|
|
(...) Thank you. Whatever magic you did made it work and I was able to vote. I feel so democratic now! :) Rob (19 years ago, 26-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Reminder: 2007/2008 LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) Election closing in a week
|
|
(...) hi rob, please try again - should work now. w. (19 years ago, 25-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: PreL3P 1.3 -help :)
|
|
(...) No problem. Thanks for the clarification - I thought it was entirely possible that something else might have been intercepting the -help argument. Jim (19 years ago, 25-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: PreL3P 1.3 -help :)
|
|
(...) Ah, thanks for bringing that to my attention. I was not aware of the difference. My addition currently understands multiple arguments with this syntax: prel3p 1.ldr 2.ldr 3.ldr Each ldr file is processed in place and the originals are copied (...) (19 years ago, 25-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
